Posts by StillCan'tDance

    this is the one Genesis album as a three-piece where I wished Steve had been still with the band. Mike wasn't quite ready to be a lead guitarist yet

    I agree. It seemed that they never even considered replacing Steve from outside the band, given how successful they'd been in consolidating the departure of Peter from within. Had Steve stayed for one more album, though, then Mike would still not have been ready to be the guitarist when Steve left (and Steve leaving the band was always on the cards, I think) so we would have had the same transitional album that And Then There Were Three was. The weakness of the album is a price worth paying for the sheer brilliance of what came after. Listen to Mike's playing on Duke, which is much more self-assured.

    https://burningshed.com/mario-…genesis-1967-to-1975_book


    It would be this book.


    Prog is a brilliant magazine. I have discovered a huge amount about this music since I started subscribing to it.

    Thanks for the link. I like some bands who happen to have been labelled "progressive" but I feel that as a genre, prog rock was a spent force by the mid-seventies (although I do like Going For The One by Yes, which I think was released in '77) so I can't really call myself a fan of the genre as a whole. Which is why a magazine such as Prog would not really appeal to me (I remember buying a copy of it once, to read on a long car journey. All it did was just make the journey seem longer.).

    for example "I Can't Dance" given that Mike heaps and lavishes an outpouring of praise upon that damned song every chance he gets!

    Well, Mike does play a pivotal role in the song. It was also a big hit which took on a new lease of life onstage. And it was something of a breakthrough for the band, being totally unlike anything they'd done before. And it was from the last really successful studio album they recorded.

    I guess I'm saying that I don't like much of what turned Phil, Peter and Mike into radio darlings. There's no lofty preaching from this prog fan either, just my opinion. Everybody has one.

    Well, no, not everyone has an opinion.


    You clearly do and it's one that I disagree with. And you can call it however you want, but when you start singing the praises of artists who have never had a hit single versus those who have, as though the former have a greater level of integrity - which is exactly what you're saying - then what else is there to call it but "lofty preaching"?

    Hats off to Ant and Steve for NOT going commercial, and I'm sure this is why their solo careers were not mentioned in the film, even though the two of them have generated tons more music than all the other past and present members of Genesis combined. The "hits" Peter, Phil and Mike had were radio friendly and generated big bucks. The level of fame each member acquired seemed to be what the focus was on in the film. Diehard prog fans appreciate it when prog artists stay true to form. Shame the others turned a blind eye (or ear) to their early fans.

    But Steve did go commercial with GTR and didn't he have a minor hit with one of the songs from Defector? The one that was used for that fishing programme in England, for which he would have received payment. Don't you think that's commercial? Selling your songs to tv companies to use them how they wish?


    Look, the fact is, as soon as a musician starts making records, they're in the game and they're as commercial as anyone else.


    With respect, I can't stand the lofty preaching from so called die-hard prog fans who scream sell-out the moment they hear a song on the radio. The greatest band to have ever existed is The Beatles. And they were all over the radio like beans on toast back in the day.

    He has made more albums than the rest of them both exploring different styles

    Quality trumps quantity every time. I understand how Hackett and his fans might have felt short-changed but let's face it, at the point when Genesis weren't sure if they would be able to carry on having lost their singer, frontman and major writer (along with Tony) Steve saved himself and made a solo record. From that point on, it was clear where his priorities lay so let's not raise the guy up above the others as though he's the saviour of the band's so-called progressive era. He's just milking his time in the band to the point of embarrassment.

    Yes I have seen many Springsteen shows over the years and one of things I love about him is the change of set lists from one night to another. He will keep a core of about 60% of the same songs but then play different songs each show. Often the audience will be holding posters up with a song they want him to sing and even if it is not on the play list he will often play it. You never know what you are going to get!!

    There's some great footage on YouTube of him playing Chuck Berry's You Never Can Tell by request at a concert, with Bruce and Little Steven working out the best key to play it in. The subsequent performance always makes me smile.

    Sorry that I called you an idiot in that case. I didn't know that the post you quoted (now deleted) was actually yours.

    Whoever wrote this is an idiot.

    I’ve just had the opportunity to watch the dvd section of the 1970-75 Lamb disc, amazing how much Tony Banks seems to not rate the album that highly?, I wonder if he has changed his opinion of it since then?. Most fans would rate it as their best work I would guess?. A great watch. I do hope they one day re issue these boxes, seems to me a no brainer and would be a good seller now the equipment to play it on has decreased in price, I remember SACD was quite a niche product and expensive when it came out, which for the most part it still is with regard to audiophile labels.

    Same thing happened with Minidisc; it didn't take on with the public and died a death. Now, the format is only used by professional performers in the entertainment industry and not by Joe Public, for whom it was originally intended.


    As for Tony and The Lamb, I think he gets very attached to how things were at the time and doesn't seem to move on from that. Both he and Peter were the main lyricists in Genesis back then and he begrudged Peter taking on the sole writing for The Lamb. Perhaps that has coloured his view of the concept as a whole, which he sees as flawed and wilfully obscure. Phil, on the other hand, sees the album as a fertile writing time for the band, when every time they sat down to jam, something good came out of it - but then, Phil didn't have a vested interest in being a lyric writer at the time so he wasn't too bothered who wrote the songs.